Losing Harry Kane a 'bad look' for Tottenham? 🤔 'Something HAS TO CHANGE!' – Shaka Hislop | ESPN FC



The ESPN FC crew discuss the politics of Tottenham Hotspur moving their star 29-year-old star striker, Harry Kane, in the summer amid sacking head coach Antonio Conte while the team is up for sale.

✔ Subscribe to ESPN+:
✔ Subscribe to ESPN FC on YouTube:

Camisetas Atletico Madrid Noticias de Fútbol – Diario de Noticias de Navarra

40 opiniones en “Losing Harry Kane a 'bad look' for Tottenham? 🤔 'Something HAS TO CHANGE!' – Shaka Hislop | ESPN FC”

  6. No offence, but these are clueless opinions, Kompany????? Just wow. The mumber of great coaches across Europe 🇪🇺?? Kane isn't worth 100 mill, maybe 50. Kane needs to be at the centre of everything. If not, he's not that good at running in behind and stretching defences.

  8. There is only one club in England who can and should buy Kane, and that is Newcastle United… I really don't think ManUnited are going to buy him at this stage of his career..

  9. The amount of muppets in the chat that think Kane at 30 in the summer, with one yr left on deal is worth 100 mil is an absolute delusory, must be Spuds fans hoping to get a truckload for their last sellable asset, cant blame them i guess

  11. Oshimhen is $150, 'Arry is $100. Victor is 5 years younger and more physical who fits ETH's high press style. 'Arry will be free in one year. If united fork out $100 for 'Arry and not go for Victor somebody needs to loose their job and hire someone with better sense and vision. Just sayin. That being said Victor will probably be snapped up by either chelsea or PSG and United will fork out $100 for 'arry and he will warm the bench with bad hamstring most of his career at united.

  12. Harry Kane bottled the move to Man City because he wanted to be a ‘good guy’. Look at how Bale and Modric left Tottenham; it wasn’t pleasant, they stopped training and leaked all kinds of stories to media and in the end it was worth it. Unfortunately that’s the only to get Levi to listen

  13. Just wait for the contract to run out.£100ml for a 30 year,injury prone player is not a good investment.£60 ml is tops unfortunately for Levy,whether he likes it or not.

  19. Levy will look at it as if Kane leaves they def don’t make champs league so lose out on 40-50 million revenue plus will cost more to buy replacement of not in champs league – so why would have to be a massive deal of at least 100 mill which makes no sense for other clubs when can they get him on wages only season after

  20. Theres no better striker in the world than Harry Kane.
    Haaland is on a similar level but Kane doesnt rely on his body andnis unbelievably professional so theres no sight of him slowing down and could just keep going till 40 and do a Messi and keep going very late in his career to win the world cup

  26. Ther isn’t 1 elite club that is ran well who would spend 100mil on a 30 year old. Once u reach over 30 it’s a complete lottery as to when a player physically declines.

  33. Am I wrong or is Kane earning less than what Aubamayeng was paid at Arsenal? Kane should get Spurs to either sell him this summer or double his salary. If he doesn't , he must be dumber than cauliflower. Kane might be turning 30 this summer but Ronaldo, Lewandowski, Benzema, Ibrahimovic were among the most feared strikers in world football even when they were in their 30s. Surely, he can be more productive if he plays for a better team than Spuds, age notwithstanding.

  38. To be honest there's always market for him! He's still only 29 still. However they should not sign him this season for 100 mln but give only 40-50 mln if not hopefully keep him for free next season!

    It comes down to him actually if he wants to stay or not BUT for him, Tottenham, their fans he should be out in his terms as he should be appreciated and not be judged! If he will leave… Tottenham must sell him for sure in order to: apart from getting the best out of him in goals & contributions get some money as well

Comentarios cerrados.