How important is international play when comparing Mbappe and Haaland? | ESPN FC Extra Time



Dan Thomas, Ale Moreno, Shaka Hislop, Frank Leboeuf and Jan Aage Fjortoft answer your questions on ESPN FC Extra Time.

0:00 Frank has some new socks today
1:21 Frank’s thoughts on his Denmark pick
2:55 Is this generation missing goal-scoring strikers?
6:06 Does Dybala deserve to start for Argentina?
6:42 How important is international play in the battle of baby GOATs between Mbappe & Haaland?
9:06 How was Frank at Thanksgiving?
10:44 Frank’s thoughts on penalty in Saudi Arabia game

✔ Subscribe to ESPN+:
✔ Subscribe to ESPN FC on YouTube:

Camisetas C. A. Osasuna Últimas noticias de fútbol de hoy para mantenerte al día de todo lo que pasa con tu equipo, jugador o competición favorita en cualquier parte del mundo.

49 opiniones en “How important is international play when comparing Mbappe and Haaland? | ESPN FC Extra Time”

  6. Frank Lebœuf has to apologize to Moroccan.first Morocco is not a poor country.second, France national team would never win a thing without players from mainly Africa. And more importantly, France a colonial country would beg food from Europe if it doesn’t exploiting and steeling Africa natural resources. Frank le bœuf be sure Africa is taking over control.

  8. How about not comparing a LW to the CF? It's like comparing Foden to Haaland, Son to Kane, Mane to Firmino…it's not fair. Output and purpose in a team is different. Just enjoy the players for who they are.

  17. Mbappe was always the better player, he entertains, is technically gifted, it’s fast, scores etc Haaland scores but the doesn’t make the team play. Mbappe is balon d’or content.

  20. Haaland will never be as good as Mbappe or Ronaldo Nazario because he relies heavily on the service of others and is not as skilled in other departments. He has an extreme low record of outside of the box goals as well.

  21. I think its pretty clear. Just take a look at the number of outside of the box goals of Mbappe compared to Haaland. Mbappe creates his own chances, scores outside of the box and has some of the best solo runs against the big teams. Haaland is a good striker but relies heavily on the assist of teammates. The two are not comparable as Mbappe is by far, the more complete striker.

  25. Mbappe and Haaland is not comparable. Totally different type of players. Also Mbappe plays for a champion Nation. Haaland plays for Norway Who almost never qualify for anything.

  26. International play needs to be taken into perspective. You can't compare the international success of players who play for powerhouse nations against those that play for nations that rarely qualify for major tournaments.

  30. Haaland doesn't takeaway from others games to score his points, he is purely additive similar to steph curry in the NBA able to play with any other superstar

  31. The striker position has changed for the worse ale. Main priority of a stiker now is to be able to press all game which is ridiculous. Many teams now have 3 forward who can press but none of them can score a goal. Its hilarious

  41. Mbappe has a more complete set of skills, can play as a center forward and still remain among the best/tremendous goal scorer in the world, as well as a wing with the same result. With 7 goals in the WC so far , he's obviously one of the best or even the best player in the world right now. And yet, the best of him is to come, it shows how amazing he is.

  43. Me and my buddies have been having a drinking game downing every time Ian saying 'unbelievable'. Gosh I wish he learned to use another word. It's been years and I worry about my liver.

  48. no. 9s are definitely scarce these days. At one time, England had Shearer, Les Ferdinand, Andy Cole, Fowler, Sheringham, Ian Wright, Owen to choose from. Now only Kane…

Comentarios cerrados.